{"id":10260,"date":"2015-07-09t14:07:44","date_gmt":"2015-07-09t18:07:44","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.k12fl.com\/press-room\/press-releases-press-room\/press-release-coalition-statement-opposing-reinstatement-of-the-global-gag-rule\/"},"modified":"2019-09-16t17:06:41","modified_gmt":"2019-09-16t21:06:41","slug":"press-release-coalition-statement-opposing-reinstatement-of-the-global-gag-rule","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.k12fl.com\/press-releases\/press-release-coalition-statement-opposing-reinstatement-of-the-global-gag-rule\/","title":{"rendered":"press release: coalition statement opposing reinstatement of the global gag rule"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n
\n

for im世界杯2022亚洲预选赛b组 te release:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

june 2015<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

rachel cooke,
喀麦隆vs巴西波胆分析 <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

202.419.3420 x45 rachel@advocatesforyouth.org<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

we join together as diverse voices from a variety of sectors to oppose any effort to reinstate the harmful global gag rule, also known as the mexico city policy. while the helms amendment restricts u.s. foreign assistance funding for abortions \u201cas a method of family planning,\u201d the global gag rule goes a step further by preventing foreign organizations using their own funds to provide information, referrals, or services for legal abortion or to advocate for access to abortion services in their own country from receiving u.s. international family planning assistance.<\/p>\n

the global gag rule causes serious harm in countries around the world. the policy interferes with the doctor-patient relationship by restricting medical information healthcare providers may offer, limits free speech by prohibiting local citizens from participating in public policy debates, and impedes women\u2019s access to family planning by cutting off funding for many of the most experienced health care providers who have chosen to prioritize quality reproductive-health services and counseling over funding that restricts care and censors information.<\/p>\n

when in place, the negative impacts of the global gag rule have been broad and severe: health services have been dismantled in a number of communities; clinics that provided a range of reproductive, maternal, and child health care, including hiv testing and counseling, were forced to close; outreach efforts to hard to reach populations were eliminated; and access to contraceptives was severely limited, resulting in more unintended pregnancies and more unsafe abortions. here is the testimony of one organization that experienced the impact of the global gag rule when it was last in place:<\/p>\n

\u201cafter refusing the terms of the gag rule in 2001, at family health options kenya we lost a significant amount of funding from usaid with serious and damaging effects on our ability to provide crucial reproductive health and family planning services. we were forced to close six clinics, all of which provided critical services to poor and underserved populations in urban, peri-urban and rural areas including family planning, voluntary counseling and testing for hiv, management of sexually transmitted infections, post-abortion care and maternal and child health services. following the closure of these clinics in 2005, at least 9,000 people \u2013 primarily women and children \u2013 were left with little or no access to health care.\u201d – fhok, 2013<\/em><\/p>\n

countries around the world are making significant progress in improving women\u2019s health and bringing back this harmful policy would undermine that momentum. developing and donor countries alike are stepping up to prioritize and make tangible headway in closing the gap on access to modern family planning through increased funding and better policies. this momentum, which includes global partnerships like family planning 2020, builds on the essential foundation of u.s. investments in this sector. a reinstatement of the gag rule would seriously hinder the effectiveness of u.s. global health investments and the growing global progress that we, as a global community, have made in expanding access to family planning for couples worldwide and in reducing maternal mortality.<\/p>\n

the u.s. should be a leader when it comes to promoting democracy, women\u2019s health, and human rights around the world. u.s. foreign aid should never be used as a tool to limit women\u2019s access to health care or to censor free speech. organizations should not be disqualified from receiving u.s. assistance because they use their own funds to provide health services and information that are legal in their home country and legal in the u.s. supporters of women\u2019s health and free speech must oppose the harmful global gag rule and we call on congress to reject all efforts to again impose this policy on women around the world.<\/p>\n

endorsing organizations:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. 喀麦隆vs巴西波胆分析 <\/li>\n
  2. aids foundation of chicago<\/li>\n
  3. aids united<\/li>\n
  4. american association of university women (aauw)<\/li>\n
  5. american civil liberties union<\/li>\n
  6. american humanist association<\/li>\n
  7. american jewish world service<\/li>\n
  8. amfar (the foundation for aids research)<\/li>\n
  9. amnesty international usa<\/li>\n
  10. avac<\/li>\n
  11. black women’s health imperative<\/li>\n
  12. care usa<\/li>\n
  13. catholics for choice<\/li>\n
  14. center for biological diversity<\/li>\n
  15. center for health and gender equity (change)<\/li>\n
  16. center for reproductive rights<\/li>\n
  17. center for women policy studies<\/li>\n
  18. colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color)<\/li>\n
  19. disciple public witness; disciples of christ<\/li>\n
  20. disciples for choice<\/li>\n
  21. disciples justice action network<\/li>\n
  22. elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation<\/li>\n
  23. engenderhealth<\/li>\n
  24. family care international<\/li>\n
  25. feminist majority<\/li>\n
  26. global doctors for choice<\/li>\n
  27. global youth coalition on hiv\/aids (gyca)<\/li>\n
  28. healthy teen network<\/li>\n
  29. institute for science and human values<\/li>\n
  30. international center for research on women<\/li>\n
  31. international planned parenthood federation<\/li>\n
  32. international planned parenthood\/western hemisphere region<\/li>\n
  33. international women’s health coalition<\/li>\n
  34. intrahealth international<\/li>\n
  35. ipas<\/li>\n
  36. john snow, inc.<\/li>\n
  37. jwi<\/li>\n
  38. lutheran women’s caucus<\/li>\n
  39. management sciences for health<\/li>\n
  40. marie stopes international-us<\/li>\n
  41. medical students for choice<\/li>\n
  42. methodist federation for social action<\/li>\n
  43. naral pro-choice america<\/li>\n
  44. national abortion federation<\/li>\n
  45. national asian pacific american women’s forum (napawf)<\/li>\n
  46. national center for lesbian rights<\/li>\n
  47. national council of jewish women<\/li>\n
  48. national family planning & reproductive health association<\/li>\n
  49. national latina institute for reproductive health<\/li>\n
  50. national lgbtq task force<\/li>\n
  51. national organization for women<\/li>\n
  52. national partnership for women & families<\/li>\n
  53. national women’s law center<\/li>\n
  54. pai<\/li>\n
  55. partners for development<\/li>\n
  56. pathfinder international<\/li>\n
  57. physicians for reproductive health<\/li>\n
  58. planned parenthood federation of america<\/li>\n
  59. population connection action fund<\/li>\n
  60. population council<\/li>\n
  61. population institute<\/li>\n
  62. population services international<\/li>\n
  63. positive women’s network – usa<\/li>\n
  64. religious institute<\/li>\n
  65. reproductive health technologies project<\/li>\n
  66. sierra club<\/li>\n
  67. sisterlove, inc.<\/li>\n
  68. society for humanistic judaism<\/li>\n
  69. the religious coalition for reproductive choice<\/li>\n
  70. union for reform judaism<\/li>\n
  71. unitarian universalist association<\/li>\n
  72. unitarian universalist women’s federation<\/li>\n
  73. united methodist general board of church & society<\/li>\n
  74. urge: unite for reproductive & gender equity<\/li>\n
  75. win (women’s information network)<\/li>\n
  76. women of reform judaism<\/li>\n
  77. women thrive worldwide<\/li>\n
  78. women’s refugee commission<\/li>\n
  79. women\u2019s research & education institute<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n